Recently, the lithium iron phosphate (LFP) industry is undergoing a critical shift from a “price war” to a “value return.” If your company has procurement needs, the current window of opportunity is crucial; delaying orders may lead to increased procurement costs and supply shortages.

I. Market Status: A New Round of Price Increases Established
The industry has seen a trend change, with the following key characteristics:
II. Trend Analysis: Multiple Factors Driving Price Increases with Sustainability
This round of price increases is not a short-term fluctuation, but a systemic correction driven by the following three forces, which is expected to continue until 2026:
Fundamental Reversal of Supply and Demand Structure: On the demand side, the explosive growth of the energy storage market is the core driving force. In 2025, the growth rate of lithium battery shipments for energy storage in China is expected to exceed 75%, and more than 90% of new energy storage installations will use lithium iron phosphate (LFP). In the power battery sector, LFP penetration has exceeded 74%. On the supply side, in 2024, the industry’s capacity utilization rate was only about 50%, with a large amount of inefficient capacity being cleared out, while high-end capacity (such as high-density products) is in short supply. According to CITIC Securities’ forecast, the global supply and demand structure of LFP materials will continue to improve in 2026.
Profound Shift in Industry Competition Logic: The three-year “price war” led to widespread losses across the industry. In 2025, under the leadership of the industry association, the industry launched an “anti-involution” initiative, clarifying the cost bottom line and aiming to rebuild a healthy pricing logic. This provides an industry consensus and foundation for prices to return to a reasonable level. Strengthening Dominance of Leading Companies: The market is highly concentrated (the top four companies hold the majority share), and downstream battery giants (such as CATL and BYD) have signed long-term contracts with core suppliers for up to five years, totaling millions of tons, with fixed prices and quantities to ensure supply. This further locks in the high-quality production capacity of leading companies, making the available supply for flexible procurement even tighter.

III. Impact on Procurement Decisions and Recommendations
Based on current trends, delaying procurement will primarily face the following risks:
Cost Risk: In a clear upward cycle, future procurement prices are likely to be significantly higher than current prices.
Supply Risk: The shortage of high-end capacity and capacity already locked in with long-term contracts may lead to extended production cycles and increased delivery uncertainty.
Therefore, we recommend the following actions: